Algorithmic Governance And Administrative Accountability: A Critical Analysis Of Ai-Driven Public Decision-Making

Authors

  • Sourab Singh Solanki Assistant Professor; Indore Institute Of Law, Indore, M.P, India. Author
  • Priyanka Malviya Assistant Professor; Indore Institute Of Law, Indore, M.P, India. Author

Keywords:

Algorithmic Governance, Artificial Intelligence, Administrative Accountability, Transparency, Public Administration, Digital Governance

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public administration has ushered in a new paradigm of governance, often termed “algorithmic governance.” Governments across the globe are increasingly deploying AI systems to enhance efficiency, predict outcomes, and streamline decision-making processes in areas such as welfare distribution, policing, taxation, and public health. While these systems promise improved administrative performance, they simultaneously raise significant concerns regarding transparency, accountability, bias, and the erosion of procedural fairness. This paper critically examines the implications of AI-driven decision-making on traditional frameworks of administrative accountability. It explores how algorithmic systems challenge established principles such as reasoned decision-making, natural justice, and public oversight. The study adopts a doctrinal and analytical methodology, drawing upon global practices and the Indian governance context, including initiatives under Digital India. The paper argues that algorithmic governance, if left unregulated, risks creating a “black box administration” where decision-making processes are opaque and difficult to contest. It further evaluates existing accountability mechanisms and identifies gaps in legal and institutional frameworks. Finally, the paper proposes reforms including algorithmic transparency, ethical AI frameworks, audit mechanisms, and strengthened regulatory oversight to ensure that technological innovation aligns with democratic values and constitutional principles.

References

1. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Brussels: European Union.

2. OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. Paris: OECD Publishing.

3. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO.

4. Cathy O'Neil. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York, NY: Crown Publishing.

5. Frank Pasquale. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

6. Virginia Eubanks. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

7. Shoshana Zuboff. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

8. Mireille Hildebrandt. (2015). Smart technologies and the end(s) of law: Novel entanglements of law and technology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

9. Danielle Keats Citron. (2008). Technological due process. Washington University Law Review, 85(6), 1249–1313.

10. Karen Yeung. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523.

11. Tarleton Gillespie. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12. NITI Aayog. (2018). National strategy for artificial intelligence #AIforAll. New Delhi: Government of India.

13. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. New Delhi: Government of India.

14. Bharat H. Desai. (2020). Artificial intelligence and governance challenges in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 421–438.

15. Anoop Surendranath. (2021). AI, accountability and constitutional governance in India. National Law School of India Review, 33(2), 89–112.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Algorithmic Governance And Administrative Accountability: A Critical Analysis Of Ai-Driven Public Decision-Making. (2026). International Journal of Research in Political Science and Public Administration, 2(2), 42-47. https://ijrpspa.com/journal/index.php/ijrpspa/article/view/16

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.